[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
ATM Spider vanes (4 or 3?)
Hi,
Its about time to begin construction of my secondary
cage. I originally planned on a four vane spider, but
have begun to reconsider.
My understanding is that vanes set at 90 deg angles
create 4 diffration spikes (a 4-vane setup). Spider
vanes set at 120 deg apart (a 3-vane spider) will
create 6 diffration spikes.
So, if the total intensity of the light spread due to
diffraction is equal for both arrangements, the
three-vane geometry would seem to be preferable as it
distubutes the light more uniformly and over a greater
area of the field. The 3-vane arrangement is more
similar to a curved spider's diffraction than the
4-vane arangement. The extra vane in the 4-vane
design would seem to add even more scattered light to
the view, in addition to the inferior diffration
pattern of the 4-vane system.
It just seems obvious to use only as many supports for
your secondary as necessary to hold it steady. Three
tensioned vanes...
Has anyone on the list tried a three vane spider on a
scope of my size (12.5")? I've seen three-vane
spiders only on smaller scopes so far. Are there
mechanical problems with the three-vane support? Am I
overlooking obvious problems?
Just wondering...
Adam Perkins
Covington, Louisiana
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one place.
Yahoo! Shopping: http://shopping.yahoo.com