ATM Bad messages

[Malcolm Purves <malcolm.purves@which.net>]

Below is a copy of an e-mail I sent to Richard, but as it is only about
1K long (hint everyone !) why shouldn't I copy it to ATM eh?
Especially as I liked the original picture, even if it was a bit of a
surprise to find it in a mail. I didnt know that can be done, now let me
see, somewhere I have a great photo of a sun-halo, 6Mb I think,,,
he-he, watchout <G>

Before I chastise Richard, let me say in his favour - at least he got
the quote in the correct order, his comment FIRST then the quote
AFTERWORDS. (and I dont usually get wound up to CAPITALISE either!)
It is particularily painfull to have to trawl through reams of stuff 
that one has read already ( see my comment to Richard about having to
pay by the second ) to search to the bottom for the new word or two.

Has anyone else noticed that the usefulness of replies seems usually
to be in inverse proportion to the length of text quoted ?

Happy grinding,
Malcolm.

-----------

Richard Schwartz wrote:
"Could people please have a little courtesy"

Yes, Richard, I wish YOU would, some of us have to pay by the second to
download your peevishness. The edit keys are a wonderfull invention you
know, and your point would still have been made.
At least the first post of 40K had the merit of an interesting picture
at the end of it.
Just my 1K's worth.

Regards,
Malcolm.