Re: [ATM] how many errors can you spot in this passage on Foucault?

[Guy Brandenburg <gfbrandenburg@yahoo.com>]

There is a much better book by WIlliam Tobin on the life and science of Leon Foucault. Unfortunately, it was not priced at a mass audience level.
Guy

lance clarke <alaskawolfjoe@hotmail.com> wrote: 
I'd just like to add my 2 cents to all of this.  I read the book when it first appeared, and yes, I wasn't happy with some of the factual errors, but I was happy that our favourite Foucault (NOT Michel !) was getting some attention.  This guy gave the first ground based proof that the earth rotates on its axis, experimented with and named (but didn't invent, unlike Aczel indicated) the Gyroscope, made the most accurate measurement of the speed of light of his time, and made significant contributions to telescope making, thus accellerating the creation of the large telescopes of the 20th century.  Despite all of this, I have never seen foucault listed in a "top 100 scientists" list.  
Personally, I think that our Foucault is one of the more underrated scientists is history, and I was glad to see him getting some exposure.
 
Lance
 
> Thanks Guy,> > That was a fun intellectual exercise.> > Best regards,> > Francis> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Guy Brandenburg" > To: "Guy Brandenburg" ; "atmlist" > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 9:20 PM> Subject: Re: [ATM] how many errors can you spot in this passage on Foucault?> > > > Some of the readers on this list found some of the errors, but here are a > > few others that were not found, or at least not yet reported on so far> >> > (1) Foucault did not claim that he invented the method of silvering glass. > > He gave credit to Liebig and Steinheil on that.> >> > (2) The only astronomical (sort-of) use of rear-reflecting mirrors > > anywhere near that time frame (that I know of) was the Mangin mirror, and > > neither Herschel nor the Earl of Rosse nor anybody else was using those > > for telescopes. Instead, they were used for searchlights.> >> > (3) Foucault's real innovations were in methods for testing the mirrors. > > He essentially invented what
 we call the Ronchi test today, among other > > things. [Bob May correctly points out that the Couder/Foucault numerical > > knife-edge test that we use today is a serious modification of Foucault's > > original knife-edge test.] However, Foucault really was the one, I think, > > who realized that you needed to produce a parabola, or something very > > close to it, if you wanted to produce good mirrors, and was the one wo > > figured out way to guarantee that.> >> > The author of that paragraph with SOO many errors was Amir Aczel, in the > > book "Pendulum: Leon Foucault and the Triumph of Science" which I got > > cheap at Daedalus books. I am generally astonished at the large number of > > errors that Aczel makes in every book that I have read of his. Why does he > > keep getting a pass on that? If nothing else, a science writer should get > > the facts right, no?> >> > PS if you look at my webpage, the first link is to a translation of > > Foucault's article.> >> > The
 points that several writers got right are:> >> > (1) Speculum metal mirrors were probably only 2 or 3 times as dense as > > glass.> >> > (2) The really huge disadvantage of speculum metal mirrors was not - > > despite what either Foucault or Aczel said - that they were too heavy or > > would 'collapse the telescope' (what a completely nutty idea), but that > > they didn't reflect very much, tarnished quickly, and once they tarnished, > > had to be polished and resurfaced in an extremely time-consuming manner > > that essentially meant that one was re-figuring the original mirror all > > over again. (Just imagine how many telescope mirrors would be in customary > > use today if you had to go through all of the laborious steps of figuring > > your mirror every 6 weeks!). With a glass mirror that had a chemically > > silvered and mechanically smoothed surface, the tarnished reflecting layer > > can be removed chemically as needed when it becomes not reflective enough, > > and
 a new reflective layer can be put on without changing the figure of > > the mirror in the slightest. But, as I said, this idea was not original > > with Foucault.> >> > (3) Azcel doesn't understand reflecting telescopes at all.> > Guy> >> >> >> > Guy Brandenburg  wrote: Boys and girls,> >> > How many factual and conceptual errors can you spot in this passage, > > written about Leon Foucault by a writer who is often considered to be one > > of the major science/math popularists of the day? (The spelling mistakes, > > if any, are all mine.)> >> > "Foucault's great discovery in the area of astronomical instrumentation > > was a method of silvering the mirrors for reflecting telescopes. > > Reflecting telescopes that had been made up to that time used bulky, heavy > > mirrors. This limited the potential size of these telescopes because the > > weight of the mirror could collapse the telescope. Foucault inaugurated a > > new method of applying a layer of silver directly to the
 front of the > > telescope's mirror, rather than a mercury amalgam that was typically > > applied to the back of the mirror. Foucault's telescopes built this way > > were lighter and of better light-gathering quality than earlier > > telescopes, as evidenced by their use today, a century and a half after > > his time."
_________________________________________________________________
Exercise your brain! Try Flexicon!
http://puzzles.sympatico.msn.ca/chicktionary/index.html?icid=htmlsig
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/




Guy Brandenburg, Washington, DC
My home page on astronomy, mathematics, education:
http://home.earthlink.net/~gfbranden/GFB_Home_Page.html
or else 
http://tinyurl.com/r6fh2

=============================
"Education isn't rocket science. It's much, much harder."
(Author unknown)
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/