[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Sling study

To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] Sling study
From: "Arjan te Marvelde" <arjan.te.marvelde@hetnet.nl>
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:35:00 +0100
Delivered-to: atm_arc@astro.umsystem.edu
List-archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <mailman.1.1165374001.16013.atm@atmlist.net>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

Dale,

Why is it that the general deformation is the same for two pegs, one peg or
a sling? I would expect totally different patterns, but it's all three
folds. How can you tell that the deformation you measure/calculate is
actually caused by the supports?
I know I 've suggested this before, but if you're sure about the mirror
being L/20, could there be an artefact of the way you process the
measurements?
Otherwise, what is your explanation?

> http://doeason.home.comcast.net/lateral_test/sling_study.pdf

Arjan te Marvelde

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] Sling study
  - From: Alexis Cousein <al@sgi.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] Trefoil caused by lateral supports
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] IR pyroelectric detetors
Previous by thread: Re: [ATM] Sidewalk or Grass walk rookie observer's
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Sling study
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread