Re: [ATM] Latteral test analysis correction

["Nils Olof Carlin" <nilsolof.carlin@telia.com>]

Dale,

You don't show what back support you use, but if the mirror rests on one peg 
near the front edge and also at the top of the backside, this is what one 
would expect - I think. With a floating cell or one point supporting the 
center of the back of the mirror, I expect the potato-chipping would be much 
less. Or do I misinterpret those images?

Nils Olof




>I have a more detailed analysis of my earlier latteral
> testing.  I discovered that what I had measured was
> not the difference between two and one peg support.
> The difference was created more by the placement of
> the contact point in relation to the center of mass of
> the mirror edge.
>
> http://doeason.home.comcast.net/lateral_test/lateral_support.pdf
>
>


_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/