Re: [ATM] Another flat-field anastigmatic aplant

["vladimir" <svla@isp.com>]

Richard F.L.R. Snashall wrote:

> Now, if I've done everything right, this one may work.  I don't
> know if anyone will like the geometry...

So, it could go down to c.obstruction ~D/3 vs.
somewhat over 0.4D in the shorter version. Still great field quality, 
but the tertiary is just too far back. Even the photons would go: 
"Man, that's a long walk..."

Vlad


_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/