Re: [ATM] Designing a simple fork with desirableflexurecharacteristics

["Jerry Reddell" <jerry.p.reddell63@sbcglobal.net>]

My distrust of software is more in a fouled up input data than program
execution. Although I have found instances where input data was ok but it
kicked off a program's one and only admitted bug which gave wrong answers
that were not recognized as immediately and obviously wrong.

Jerry  Reddell

-----Original Message-----
From: atm-bounces@atmlist.net [mailto:atm-bounces@atmlist.net]On Behalf
Of Richard
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:45 AM
To: Tom Krajci
Subject: Re: [ATM] Designing a simple fork with desirable
flexurecharacteristics


Hi Tom,

Tuesday, December 6, 2005, 1:12:48 AM, you wrote:

TK> Please let me know if I have made any significant errors in this
analysis or
TK> assumptions.

One thing to consider is that some software can correct non
linearities in guiding, like PRiSM for example.

When you say you don't want to trust FE output, then what can
you trust?. If you can get access to something like Solidworks
with Cosmos suite then it's output is quite trustable,
regardless of complexity of the structure. Anyway, a quick check
in two axes with a DTI should put your mind at rest.

--

Best regards,
  Richard in the UK

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/


_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/