[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: ATM armchair theorizing
--- Tom Krajci <tkrajci@san.osd.mil> wrote:
> I'd prefer that more people were involved in
> armchair research, rather
> than theorizing. One starting point is the ATM
> archives at:
> http://astro.umsystem.edu/atm/
> (One of these days our email posts to this list
> will, hopefully, have added to them this URL.)
Here here. Excellent suggestions.
<hint>
That sure would be nice, along with the ATM swap list
too...
</hint>
> >...If this is the case then why not a million point
> > support in the form of say
> > short pile bristle carpet where each bristle will
> > only place an extremely
> > small pressure point before deforming to spread
> > the load further?
>
> You need to cool the back of the mirror. Your
> proposal makes it difficult.
I'm not arguing for carpet here or against standard
cells, but what about using flex tubing with some sort
of fluid (water?? :-) coolant? Could be woven into
the carpet, or just used in place of the carpet.
I'm sure that tubing probably has more than its fair
share of problems that I am not seeing.
Seems to me that you really just want the mirror to be
at thermal equilibrium, and just slightly above the
dewpoint temperature and well supported.
> > Maybe that is where the complex engineering
> > solution could come into play
> > as the support for the carpet would also have to
> > be very flat and non
> > flexible so as not to allow the mirror to follow
> > said flex.....
>
> You are substituting one 'rather complex engineering
> solution' for
> another. Can you show us how your proposal is
> simpler, or more
> accurate, easier to fabricate, or more likely to
> succeed? That would make it more attractive.
That is a very useful corollary of Occam's Razor.
Please define "very flat". I don't see the need for
ultra flat surfaces when you are using very flexible
material like carpet. You could always make a full
diameter optical flat for your support for your
carpet... :-)
Seriously, I'm not sure why using plate aluminum
[insert your favorite metal here] stock doesn't meet
his criteria, as it is pretty flat stuff and can be
made as stiff as one desires (ribbing, thickness, ...)
pretty easily.
Thanks.
-Ralph
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com