Re: Re: ATM Authoritative Quote from New York Times

[burningclown@burningclown.com]

Oh, if I only -had- a dark sky, or a vehicle to access same (mine was totaled 
recently) or the financial structure in place to purchase a new one (I have a 
lousy-paying job)! What I wouldn't do ...

Hate to whine but there it is.

Starless in Brooklyn, NY,

Glenn 

+---------------------+
This is not a signature
+---------------------+


 On Wed, 4 Dec 2002 
tomjan@ozemail.com.au wrote:

> 
> You do get what you pay for, don't you!
> 
> As for the Astig, I don't know how you go about re-figuring those adaptive optics....
> 
> Mind you the control processor is quite something tho'
> 
> Thomas.
> www.tjanstrom.com
> > 
> > From: Ross Sackett <rsackett00@yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: ATM Authoritative Quote from New York Times
> > Date: 04/12/2002 0:26:19
> > To: atm@shore.net
> > 
> > 
> > --- tomjan@ozemail.com.au wrote:
> > > 
> > > I guess then I'm a real cheap skate, cause I still
> > > like to lay back in the lounge chair and just stare
> > > at the sky. Nothing cheaper than the human eye-ball,
> > > MK-I....
> > > 
> > > Thomas.
> > 
> > Thomas:
> > 
> > Like you I enjoy using my unit-power binoculars, but
> > they seem to suffer from diminishing quality.  A star
> > test shows considerable astigmatism on the right side,
> > and there is that annoying dewing problem on chilly
> > nights.  I've read that porro prisms are preferable to
> > roof prisms, but my pair seems to have neither.
> > 
> > I guess you get what you pay for.
> > 
> > Ross
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > 
> > 
> 
> This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au
> 
> 
> 

-- 
+---------------------+
This is not a signature
+---------------------+