[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: ATM your refractor
- To: ATM List <ATM@shore.net>
- Subject: Re: ATM your refractor
- From: "Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@rcn.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 01:00:46 +0000
- References: <000001c296e3$2a813a90$4dc1fea9@tom> <3DE684F5.2094B513@bellatlantic.net> <3DE78204.5020305@rcn.com> <3DE8DA14.A400A8D2@bellatlantic.net> <3DE918D1.8040607@rcn.com> <3DE93C00.5D94C21@bellatlantic.net>
- Reply-To: "Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@rcn.com>
- Sender: owner-atm@shore.net
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
Jerald F. Wright wrote:
>
> "Richard F.L.R. Snashall" wrote:
>
>
>
>>Progress, however, is slow... rumor has it that means I'm learning a
>>lot;-)
>>
>> Rick S.
>
>
> When you get that thing done if it performs anywhere near design it
will be some super
> scope.
> I'm sure you are learning a bunch. Are you planning to have anti
refletion coatings
> applied to the finished glass and have you polished all surfaces yet
or are you doing
> one at a time? Seems the last I heard you were calibrating the
spherometer.
>
The spherometer goes into the shop next week (I hope).
The first lens position has actually been polished twice. I'm
still trying to get a feel for knowing when I can consider the
surface spherical. There doesn't seem to be any way to get
feedback into the loop just yet, except where the lenses must
mate, and we know where that went.
In this design, only the last lens really needs to have AR coating
to reduce any ghost (4 mm diameter). It might just be easier to
get them all coated, though, depending on the cost. I don't know
the cost yet... or where to get it done...
Rick S.
> Jerry
>
>