I have no apologies for my criticism. What is a "friendly" criticism ? If things cannot work, how do YOU say it ?
Let me say one simple fact. If someone doesn't feel confident to check whether certain design can or cannot work, if one cannot do a proper ANALYSIS of the existing design (which is beleive me far, far simpler part), what chances are of getting right a brand new, revolutionary and groundbreaking design ? I'd say pretty small.
Just look at sci.astro. I don't want that ATM becomes dumping ground for unfounded theories, contemplations or pointless discussions. If that is what majority REALLY wants, I have no other choice but to thank everyone for the time and look elsewhere.
Best regards, Bratislav