[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?

To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?
From: "Jan van Gastel" <jhm.vangastel@wanadoo.nl>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 19:33:07 +0200
Delivered-to: atm_arc@astro.umsystem.edu
List-archive: <http://www.atmlist.net/pipermail/atm>
List-help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>, <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <11891800.1154678271942.JavaMail.tomcat@pne-ps2-sn2> <44D378C3.3030007@uiuc.edu>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

Yes, let's hope this myth is buried now.

Jan
http://home.wanadoo.nl/jhm.vangastel/Astronomy/

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Lockwood" <melockwo@uiuc.edu>
To: <atm@atmlist.net>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?

> Hopefully this thread of messages will debunk the ideas that coatings 
> significantly affect mirror cooling and correction, and that a mirror 
> should be undercorrected if it is to be used on nights of falling 
> temperatures.  We really want fully-corrected mirrors close to ambient 
> temperature.
> 
> Mike Lockwood

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?
  - From: spoon@pageamerica.net

References:
- Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?
  - From: Nils Olof Carlin <nilsolof.carlin@telia.com>
- Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?
  - From: Mike Lockwood <melockwo@uiuc.edu>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?
Next by Author: [ATM] wire spider ready!
Previous by thread: Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] undercorrecting?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread