[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] 32" Focal ratio

To: Richard <cnc@cncservo.co.uk>, polaraligned <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: Re: [ATM] 32" Focal ratio
From: Polaraligned <polaraligned@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 20:21:20 -0400
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <0IKK00F08CPEE8A0@mta15.srv.hcvlny.cv.net><000501c596e9$a01e16c0$6400a8c0@Screaming586><1769865810.20050802000343@cncservo.co.uk>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

Well if I was an optical engineer I would not be seeking advice.
Objective, of course, is to get the best possible images out of
a large folded newtonian, with the widest field possible.


Scott



> 
> Define the objective -> write a specification -> design it.
> 
> -- 
> 
> Best regards,
>  Richard in the UK
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

References:
- [ATM] 32" Focal ratio
  - From: polaraligned <polaraligned@optonline.net>
- Re: [ATM] 32" Focal ratio
  - From: Richard <cnc@cncservo.co.uk>

Prev by Author: Re: [ATM] 32" Focal ratio
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] 32" Focal ratio
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] 32" Focal ratio
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] 32" Focal ratio
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread