Re: [ATM] mirror or lens?

[Ken Hunter <atm_ken_hunter@yahoo.com>]

"A rose by any other name is still a rose..."
 
I'd let it die and move on.
 
Ken Hunter


Mike Shuken <mikeshuken@value.net> wrote:
Hello,

I was at a family lunch the other day and I was telling the folks about a 
reflector telescope that my son and I just built. Most of the family is 
from a non-technical background, and one of them asked "How big is the lens?"

I said, "Well, it's not really a lens, it's a series of two mirrors, and 
the eye piece is really the only *lens* in the telescope."

And one of the family members said, "A mirror is still a lens." And he's 
an astrophysicist, and who really wants to argue with an 
astrophysicist? So I didn't knwo what to say.

Anyway, I always thought that a mirror wasn't a lens, a lens was something 
that light passed through and was changed, vs. a mirror that changed the 
light by reflected it.

Any thoughts on weather a mirror is a lens?

Best,

Mike


_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/