RE: [ATM] Banishing the diagonal

[GARY FUCHS <gary@rcn.com>]

Thanks. I think our club may have a copy.

Gary Fuchs

---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 12:28:04 -0600
>From: "lou krajci" <loukrajci@comcast.net>  
>Subject: RE: [ATM] Banishing the diagonal  
>To: <atm@atmlist.net>
>
>>From: Gary Fuchs <gary@rcn.com>
>
> >>What was your goal?
>
>>To understand more about the effects of changes to the 
secondary size
>>and placement. I've been going on the assumption that 
secondary size
>>could be varied somewhat, provided the overall design, f-
ratio, etc.,
>>allowed it, without compromising the apparent quality of 
the view - what
>>I'm realistically going to be able to discern....
>
>Consider finding a copy of this book:
>http://www.willbell.com/tm/tm5.htm
>It will provide you good info on secondary mirror 
obstruction issues, as
>well as other info...and has far higher S/N ratio than most 
astronomy email
>forums.
>
>Tom Krajci
>Albuquerque, New Mexico
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - Release Date: 
8/11/2004
>
>_______________________________________________
>ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/