[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM plop results...

To: Martin Trittelvitz <Marty.T@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: ATM plop results...
From: Ron Forrester <rjf@skyhackers.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:47:59 -0700
Cc: atm@shore.net
In-Reply-To: <3B900A80.7030409@t-online.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Martin Trittelvitz <Marty.T@t-online.de>, atm@shore.net
References: <20010831141940.A1635@skyhackers.org> <3B900A80.7030409@t-online.de>
Reply-To: Ron Forrester <rjf@skyhackers.org>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i

On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 12:06:56AM +0200, Martin Trittelvitz wrote:
> Hi!
> If you give the angles in the "Cell Design" free for optimize, you can 
> improve the design of the 9 point celle nearly as good as the 18-point 
> cell. Try.

Based on this and a couple of other tips, I generated an optimized 9pt
cell that doesn't look too bad:

   http://www.zero-ping.com:8080/plop/

I still think the 18pt is nicer, and only a little more
work... Comments?

rjf&

References:
- ATM plop results...
  - From: Ron Forrester <rjf@skyhackers.org>

Prev by Author: ATM plop results...
Next by Author: Re: ATM Aluminum Standard Sizes?
Prev by thread: ATM plop results...
Next by thread: Re: ATM plop results...
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread