[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
ATM More Spheroidalage
In his reply to "ATM Spherical mirrors", Guy Toutant quoted Texereau's "How
to Make a Telescope" who intern referenced A. Couder "Lunettes et
Telescopes"
Couder's rule of thumb f^3=34.9*D^4, as echoed by Texereau contains hidden
within it a tolerable wavefront degradation criteria. In the preceding
paragraph Texereau implies that a telescope mirror, not blustered over by
an industrial worker needs an un-haphazardly figure of 1/10th wave or
better. The title of the table printed on page 19 states that the focal
ratios listed will satisfy Rayleigh's Criterion for the associated
diameters.
Couder's rule is derived from the root of a three term expansion of the
difference between the saggitta of a sphere and a parabola. Specifically
this yields:
min required focal ratio = (1/8) (mirror radius / degradation criteria)^(1/3)
where the mirror radius and allowed profile difference are in like units.
Remember, this is a mirror, 1/8 wave profile error yields 1/4 wave
wavefront error, the so called Rayleigh Criterion.
Reverse engineering Couder's rule of thumb we see that it amounts to one
wave wavefront error.
wavefront error = (1 / 558.4)^3 cm = 574 nm
Not exactly a quarter wave, but then given Texereau's propensities, not
exactly unexpected either.
Anthony
PS Below is a table of minimum focal ratios required for spheroidal
mirrors. Differing wavefront criteria (in waves) and diameters (in
millimeters) are given. Lambda is 574 nm
wavefront 1/10 1/8 1/4 1/2 1
diameter
80 mm 14.0 13.0 10.3 8.2 6.5
100 mm 15.0 14.0 11.1 8.8 7.0
150 mm 17.2 16.0 12.7 10.1 8.0
200 mm 19.0 17.6 14.0 11.1 8.8
250 mm 20.4 19.0 15.0 11.9 9.5
300 mm 21.7 20.1 16.0 12.7 10.1
400 mm 23.9 22.2 17.6 14.0 11.1
750 mm 29.4 27.3 21.7 17.2 13.7
PPS I know, a 30" sphere, silly silly, but I was curious.