[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM Attaching poles

To: "Ed Erbeck Jr." <ed@crazyedoptical.com>, atm@shore.net
Subject: Re: ATM Attaching poles
From: Michael Lindner <mikell@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2001 21:55:36 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <B78DF53E.22E06%ed@crazyedoptical.com>
References: <B78DF53E.22E06%ed@crazyedoptical.com>
Reply-To: Michael Lindner <mikell@optonline.net>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net



On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 18:04:46 -0700, Ed Erbeck Jr. said:

> 
>  
>  > From: c-h.scholz@t-online.de (Scholz)
>  
>  >  http://www.geocities.com/ultralight24f4/dis.html ... Comments are welcome!
>  
> ...removing the Carbon Tubes might be a problem.

If I understand correctly, the carbon tube slips OVER the aluminum tube, so it
would be in warm conditions that it would be hard to get on/off. Speaking of
which, the truss tubes operate in either compression or tension. Compression
would be fine, but tension would simply pull the tube off of the connector, no?

-- 
Michael Lindner
http://home.att.net/~mikel
http://www.starastronomy.org
http://www.atmsite.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ATM Attaching poles
  - From: "Frank Ward" <thewards@mindspring.com>

References:
- Re: ATM Attaching poles
  - From: "Ed Erbeck Jr." <ed@crazyedoptical.com>

Prev by Author: Re: ATM Most efficient downloads
Next by Author: Re: ATM baffle question
Prev by thread: Re: ATM Attaching poles
Next by thread: Re: ATM Attaching poles
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread