[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[ATM] Starlaps (aka petal, deformed, Zulu laps)
Tex sez, p. 95, "...it is difficult to control fully the effect produced or
to terminate the action abruptly once the defect is sufficiently
minimized." I hadn't thought of the spell-length problem still remaining
even when the starlap has "fully controlled effect", i.e., scaled with most
action at the deviation peak down to zero action at the valley.
For example, I simulated parabolizing an 8"f/6 sphere with a perfect
starlap. As the spell length increased, the conic constant b decreased
steadily: 0 ... -.5 ... -1 ... oops, going hyperbolic, at which point the
starlap is now perfectly wrong.
My starlap design program has a scaling parameter - guess I'll try reducing
it for my 10"f/2.6 RC primary refiguring - the last 30 s spell really overshot.
-- Jim Burrows
-- mailto://burrjaw@earthlink.net
-- http://home.earthlink.net/~burrjaw
-- Seattle N47.4723 W122.3662 (WGS84)
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/