[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

RE: [ATM] ATM Edmund secondary mirrors - worth it?

To: ATM Mailing List <atm@atmlist.net>
Subject: RE: [ATM] ATM Edmund secondary mirrors - worth it?
From: Mark Holm <mdholm@telerama.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:02:22 -0400
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

> What good is a certification? If they advertise 1/12 wave and it is
> not a certification does not make it so. Sounds like a lot of money for a
> piece of paper that probably won't be a part of the telescope.

On their website, Protostar describe the methods they use for testing 
their diagonal mirrors.  The description is clear and matter of fact. 
No hype or obfuscation that I can see.

-- 
Mark Holm
mdholm@telerama.com

_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Prev by Author: [ATM] Intentional astigmatism
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Use of bearings in (static) mirror cells
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] ATM Edmund secondary mirrors - worth it?
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] ATM Edmund secondary mirrors - worth it?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread