[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ATM] Extended Object Brightness

To: richas@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [ATM] Extended Object Brightness
From: Ken Hunter <atm_ken_hunter@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 07:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: atm@atmlist.net
In-Reply-To: <410-22004461021416505@earthlink.net>
List-Archive: <http://home.simoivanov.com/pipermail/atm>
List-Help: <mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=help>
List-Id: The Amateur Telescope Makers List <atm.atmlist.net>
List-Post: <mailto:atm@atmlist.net>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.atmlist.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/atm>,<mailto:atm-request@atmlist.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: atm-bounces@atmlist.net

--- Richard Schwartz <richas@earthlink.net> wrote:
> OK, point the telescope at the sun, put a
> hundred-dollar bill behind the
> eyepiece, and observe.  Is that what you want to
> have happen to your
> eyeball?
> 
> 

NO! What he's asking is if the telescope can collect
and concentrate energy of an extended object. Yes for
the Sun and No for the Nebula... That's what he's
being told and he's just asking why.

Ken Hunter

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - File online by April 15th
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
_______________________________________________
ATM mailing list http://www.atmlist.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [ATM] Extended Object Brightness
  - From: "Richard Ozer" <rozer@pacbell.net>

References:
- Re: [ATM] Extended Object Brightness
  - From: "Richard Schwartz" <richas@earthlink.net>

Prev by Author: [ATM] Ronchi Confusion
Next by Author: Re: [ATM] Whiffle Tree cell using 'Swivel Leveling Mounts'?
Prev by thread: Re: [ATM] Extended Object Brightness
Next by thread: Re: [ATM] Extended Object Brightness
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread