[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM the outer limits

To: <atm@shore.net>
Subject: Re: ATM the outer limits
From: "Bill T." <twentiethwave@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2001 20:48:23 -0600
References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010411181614.0397d080@mail.surfglobal.net> <3AD508FE.A0C59179@att.net>
Reply-To: "Bill T." <twentiethwave@hotmail.com>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net

Ken Lowther wrote:
> Wasn't there an article in S&T where the author of an article suggested
> that at some point thick mirrors may actually be more of a problem to
> support well than a thin one?

FWIW I have two 14.5" Pyrex mirrors, one is 2.5" thick and the other 1.4".
The 2.5" is a much worse "slumper" than the 1.4".

Bill Tondreau

References:
- ATM the outer limits
  - From: Ina Ron Lippard Renaissance Reproductions <renrepro@surfglobal.net>
- Re: ATM the outer limits
  - From: lowther@att.net

Prev by Author: Re: ATM Are you parallel?
Next by Author: ATM Any recent big BVC mirrors?
Prev by thread: Re: ATM the outer limits
Next by thread: Re: ATM the outer limits
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread