[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: ATM 16" blank thickness extended question

To: atm@shore.net
Subject: Re: ATM 16" blank thickness extended question
From: David McCarter <mccarterd@claven.fanshawec.on.ca>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 17:43:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <2BEBA9339719D311A3F900A0D2051282CB23F5@cvs-mssgscbb5.cannon.af.mil>
Reply-To: David McCarter <mccarterd@claven.fanshawec.on.ca>
Sender: owner-atm@shore.net


>(Based on that alone, maybe we should label 1:6 thickness
>ratio mirrors as "excessively thick."  ;-)

I think there is great merit to this idea. As has been said here many
times, I know how to support a thin mirror, but I don't know how to quickly
cool a thick one. Certainly no reason, given some care in polishing and
testing, that 1:10 to 1:14 mirrors shouldn't have a great figure.

Dave

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ATM 16" blank thickness extended question
  - From: "Thomas A. Moulton" <w2vy@xanthus.net>

References:
- Re: ATM 16" blank thickness extended question
  - From: Krajci Tom J Maj 27OSS/IN <Tom.Krajci@cannon.af.mil>

Prev by Author: ATM polishing 24" taking a long time
Next by Author: Re: ATM Glue for Formica?
Prev by thread: Re: ATM 16" blank thickness extended question
Next by thread: Re: ATM 16" blank thickness extended question
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread