[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML]: dry air vs. nitrogen purge

To: astro-photo@nightsky.com
Subject: Re: [APML]: dry air vs. nitrogen purge
From: Chuck Vaughn <aa6g@aa6g.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 20:31:31 -0800
In-Reply-To: <360C31FE.235C@snet.net>
References: <3.0.1.32.19980924070057.009fb270@pop3.cyberenet.net> <360A5BA2.3CA9@aa6g.org> <v03130300b230cb5533b8@[205.149.171.167]>
Reply-To: astro-photo@nightsky.com
Sender: owner-astro-photo@nightsky.com

The Astro-Photography Mailing List
------------------------------------

Fred,
>
>   Chuck in a recent post you wrote about using a nitrogen purge
>   to suppress moisture effects.
>   Would ambient air run through a drying filter be just as good or
>   you also concerned about the presence of oxygen?

I think dry air would be okay since I don't have a problem on dry
nights with no purge. I don't know how good those drying filters
are.

Chuck <aa6g@aa6g.org>

References:
- Re: [APML]: Image Registration
  - From: Jerry Lodriguss <jml@astropix.com>
- Re: [APML]: Image Registration
  - From: Chuck Vaughn <aa6g@aa6g.org>
- Re: [APML]: Image Registration
  - From: Chuck Vaughn <aa6g@aa6g.org>
- Re: [APML]: dry air vs. nitrogen purge
  - From: Fred Ruszala <u11595@snet.net>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML]: Image Registration
Next by Author: Re: [APML]: Vacuum Pre-Hypering
Prev by thread: Re: [APML]: dry air vs. nitrogen purge
Next by thread: R: [APML]: Image Registration
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread