Re: [APML]: "The Astrograph" magazine

[Robert Hoyle <rhoyle@earthlink.net>]

The Astro-Photography Mailing List
------------------------------------

I pretty much agree with John G.'s assessment .  Also took it for 2 yrs
-- but this was back in '92 or so.  Seemed a little "simplified"
to me -- at least that's kind of the impression I remember.

Robert.  Clayton, Ca. (near Oakland).


John D. Garner wrote:

> The Astro-Photography Mailing List
> ------------------------------------
>
> Herm,
>
>          I took it for two years, but recently let my subscription lapse.  I guess
> my feeling was that it was sort of like the last 4 pages of S&T or
> Astronomy, but with larger, mostly B&W photos.  I didn't find the articles
> nearly as enlighteneing as the APML.  If they were bigger, they might be
> better.  Still, if I were a bit flusher at the moment, I would have
> renewed.  Sorry if this review is vague, but that was my impression of The
> Astrograph.  If others feel differently, I wouldn't dispute them.  Guess
> this doesn't help you much--sorry.
>
>                                         John
>
> At 01:20 AM 9/15/98 GMT, you wrote:
> >The Astro-Photography Mailing List
> >------------------------------------
> >
> >Does anybody have a subscription to "The Astrograph" magazine, how is
> >it?..the cost is right at $12 per year.
> >
> >http://www.erols.com/astrogph/astrogph.htm
> >
> >Herm
> >