Re: [APML] Re: Japanese astronomical magazine

["Bradley" <bhope@thorngarden.net>]

Well, at least film isn't completely dead. S&T has two film images in the
Reader's section. Congrats, and 'very' nice shots, to Chris Schur and
Lorenzo Comolli for their contributions. Guess there's still some life after
digital after all.

I do take lunar and planetary images digitally, with a ToUcam, but otherwise
I only use film for deep sky. I think a webcam can do a lot better than film
(for those subjects).

Bradley

Thorn Garden Observatory
http://astronomy.thorngarden.net

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Voetsch" <alanv12952@yahoo.com>
To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] Re: Japanese astronomical magazine


> Here's an idea; everyone who still shoots exclusively film can get
> together for a group (film) photo. And you're right Steve, so we can
> call the picture "The few remaining astrosaurs who can't (or won't)
> evolve". 8-)
>
> BTW, I'd be interested in having a general idea of how many folks still
> do shoot EXCLUSIVELY with emulsion. Any guesses? I'm one.
>
> Alan
>
> --- steve banbury <banburys@sonic.net> wrote:
>
> > Of dinosaurs?
> >
> > :-)     steve
> >
> >
> > Alan Voetsch wrote:
> >
> > >--- Chris Cook <chris@cookphoto.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>or including more photos.... <G>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >Yeah, film photos.

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo