Re: [APML] OT IC 63

["Stuart Heggie" <Stuart.J.Heggie@sympatico.ca>]

Jim, I think it looks great and I think it is consistent with 3 hours
through the 6nm filter.

I think SGBNR is great but have been playing with NeatImage and it has a
knack for keep sharp the things that should be sharp while smoothing the
things you want smooth. Have you tried it? I wonder if you could get more
detail in the brighter nebula without having a lot of noise this way.

Stuart
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Janusz" <jjanusz@dc.rr.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:58 AM
Subject: [APML] OT IC 63


> It always amazes me that I can have three hours of data and the object is
> still noisy.  My IC 63 required the use of SGBNR noise reduction to smooth
> it a bit.  Anyway I still like it and have posted it for your review.
> Details on the page, comments welcome.
>
> Hope you enjoy it.
>
> http://www.astroimager.net/Page-180-CCD-65.html
>
> Jim
>
> Astronomy Web Page at
> www.astroimager.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo