Re: [APML] registering images...

["Richard Crisp" <rdcrisp@earthlink.net>]

one other benefit of Registar is that it is really good for mosaics and is 
good for composite images where various parts are at significantly different 
image scales.

it is a really good program but has a weird human interface.

rdc
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alan Voetsch" <alanv12952@yahoo.com>
To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 12:00 PM
Subject: RE: [APML] registering images...


> Hey all,
>
> --- "Lane, Jason R" <jason.lane@navy.mil> wrote:
>> Everything else I need to do can be done in Photoshop.  When I was
>> trying to decide on Registar vs. programs that registered and also
>> did image processing, I had the thought of "why should I pay more for
>> redundant features?"  Since I already had Photoshop, that thought
>> clinched it.  I'm very happy with the combination (Registar and
>> Photoshop).
>
> Then, would most agree that if you already had image processing
> software that Registar is the way to go?
>
> I need to get off my butt and get something for registering. PWPro is
> OK and far better than PS from what I've heard, but I think I'm about
> ready for a dedicated program.
>
> Alan
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo 

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo