[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Film Creep

To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: Re: [APML] Film Creep
From: "Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:08:51 -0500
List-Archive: <http://seds.org/mailman/private/astro-photo>
List-Help: <mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=help>
List-Id: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo.seds.org>
List-Post: <mailto:astro-photo@seds.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <000501c38546$6ce75250$51572744@Mars><002c01c38556$9a7d7220$0100000a@9ev0s><000a01c3855b$36a384b0$51572744@Mars>
Reply-To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sender: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org

Your description below is one I've also seen. Isolated regions of defocus.
That's got to be a film issue.
Bobby

From: "Steve Walters" <s-walters@comcast.net>
> Hi Bobby,
> This usually let the film lift off a bit and one
> region or another would be defocused.


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

References:
- [APML] Film Creep
  - From: "Steve Walters" <s-walters@comcast.net>
- Re: [APML] Film Creep
  - From: "Bobby Middleton" <bobm@koyote.com>
- Re: [APML] Film Creep
  - From: "Steve Walters" <s-walters@comcast.net>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Film Creep
Next by Author: [APML] 3rd party printer inks
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] Film Creep
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Film Creep
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread