dtlocke wrote: > By reputation, the 300 f4.5 non-ED version is as good, or nearly as > good, as the 300 f4.5 ED. The ED version is excellent. Wide open > will be be great. > Thanks for that good news Dick. I appreciate the help. ___ Tim _______________________________________________ Astro-Photo mailing list Astro-Photo@seds.org http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo