[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] tech pan revisited

To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo@seds.org>
Subject: Re: [APML] tech pan revisited
From: Jerry Lodriguss <jerry@astropix.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 15:05:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <365CC1B6-DE61-11D7-8AA6-000393ABD4BA@aa6g.org>
List-Archive: <http://seds.org/mailman/private/astro-photo>
List-Help: <mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=help>
List-Id: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo.seds.org>
List-Post: <mailto:astro-photo@seds.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo>,<mailto:astro-photo-request@seds.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <00cf01c37264$6c2d25a0$6401a8c0@dc.rr.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of Film Astrophotography <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sender: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org



Are these scratches on the emulsion side, or the film base side of the film?

And, to be completely sure I understand the direction, are you saying that 
they are perpendicular to the length of the film roll?

Jerry



Photoshop for Astrophotographers - http://www.astropix.com/PFA/PFA.HTM











_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [APML] tech pan revisited
  - From: "Scott Hammonds" <shammonds@creatorsview.com>

References:
- Re: [APML] tech pan revisited
  - From: "Jim Janusz" <jjanusz@dc.rr.com>
- Re: [APML] tech pan revisited
  - From: Chuck Vaughn <aa6g@aa6g.org>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Possible Fake or Worse??
Next by Author: RE: [APML] tech pan revisited
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] tech pan revisited
Next by thread: RE: [APML] tech pan revisited
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread