Re: [APML] Possible Fake or Worse??

[Jerry Lodriguss <jerry@astropix.com>]

I don't know why you would doubt the integrity of this photo, especially 
based on the outstanding quality of work that Stephen has produced previously.

Lots of people have shot long-exposure deep-sky shots with a Canon 10D, D60 
and even the 1Ds, so there is nothing out of the ordinary about this photo 
being taken with that camera and a CMOS chip.

See:

http://www.ricksastro.com/Gallery/htm/10D.htm

And:

http://velatron.com/dca/gallery/

And:

http://www.mlunsold.com/ILExamples.html

Jerry


>Could this be true??
>Mr. Pitt says this is his photo of M31 on a CMOS 10D Digital Camera???
>I seem to recognize this photo?????!!!!!!
>Any help with this from the group??
>Ray Rochelle
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Stephen Pitt" <lthuedk@pe.net>
>To: <digital_astro@yahoogroups.com>
>Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 2:38 PM
>Subject: [digital_astro] Testing the Digital Waters
>
>
> > This is my first image post using a digital anything,
> >
> > http://www.light-to-dark.com/m31_10D.html
> >
> > and I have found the 10D to be quite a challenge, with a fresh set of
> > ideosyncrasies to deal with, like noise, uneven field colour
> > temperature (possibly heat from the electronics), and vivid background
> > colour pixellation.  The processing is at least as challenging as that
> > of film and its easy understand the need for dedicated software that
> > could make stacking and dark frame subtraction less labor intensive.
> >
> > Admittedly, I got the 10D hoping for a panacea, a short cut to quick
> > imaging, but find such things as noise reduction-like SBGNR-more of a
> > necessity than an occasional luxury.  But then, I'm not used to
> > stacking more than 2 or 3 film images and ending up with smooth pictures.
> >
> > Anyway, the chip is challenging.  I can't help but wondering about
> > cooling effects on image quality.  Perhaps, when winter comes, the
> > CMOS will be more image friendly, as ambients of 72-75 deg., such as
> > those during the above acquisition seem to be quite noisy.
> >
> > All of this is to say, I have come to respect the work done by others
> > using their digital cameras.  And, I have to ask: Would such programs
> > like I.P. make more efficient use of time in processing the images
> > than say, P.S. and RegiStar?
> >
> > Thanking you for a reply,
> >
> > Stephen: http://www.light-to-dark.com/ iew my Photos go here
>http://www.usefilm.com/browse.php?mode=port&data=17313
>Dance like no one's watching
>Love like you've never been hurt before
>Live like heaven is here on earth
>121.80/39.75
>Ray Rochelle
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Astro-Photo mailing list
>Astro-Photo@seds.org
>http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo


Photoshop for Astrophotographers - http://www.astropix.com/PFA/PFA.HTM











_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo