[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Fuji Sensia 400, anygood? Same as Provia?

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] Fuji Sensia 400, anygood? Same as Provia?
From: Joe Pedit <pedit@email.unc.edu>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:47:10 -0400
Organization: UNC-CH
References: <3D9DC676@webmail.ksu.edu>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020508 Netscape6/6.2.3

Scott Bean wrote:

> Hello all,
> 
> I was reading a recent article in one of the photomags (I can't remember which 
> one) that stated that Provia 400 and Fuji Sensia 400 were the same emulsion.  
> Has anyone tried Fuji Sensia 400 for astro work? I like the price on the 
> Sensia much better than the one on Provia...
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Scott

The technical data sheets are at:
http://www.fujifilm.co.uk/technical/index.html
The characteristic and spectral sensitivity curves are very similar, but 
not identical.  $4.79 versus $7.99 at B&H... might be worth pursuing.

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

References:
- [APML] Fuji Sensia 400, anygood? Same as Provia?
  - From: Scott Bean <scotbean@ksu.edu>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Royal Gold and Supra films
Next by Author: Re: [APML] Help! new scanner analysis rainbow streamers
Prev by thread: [APML] Fuji Sensia 400, anygood? Same as Provia?
Next by thread: Re: [APML] Fuji Sensia 400, anygood? Same as Provia?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread