|
Hi Monte!
Thanks for your comments.
BTW, I have a question about scanning
pictures. I know that I should set resolution as high as possible (2400 dpi -
the highest resolution in my scanner), but how about "scale"? It's in
percent (should I set 100%, 50%)?.
Best regards, Chris.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002
10:42 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] Images
Dear Chris,
They are quite good and you have done well to get that sort of result with lab
pictures. My only comment would be try to match the objects to the image scale
offered by each lens. For example it would be better to use the 300mm more.
The 50mm looks like a nice piece of coke bottle but is probably better suited
to milky way shots. I have a 50mm too and that's where it is best. Its image
scale is a bit too small for much else.
That said, your early efforts are far better
than my early disasters.
Don't give up you are on the right
track.
Regards
Monte
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 3:05
AM
Subject: [APML] Images
My name is Christopher Gaudy and this is
my first message on this list.
I have just recieve from minilab my
astro-images, which I have done in September. I'm new in astrophotography
and these pictures are my third attempt. I would like to know what do you
think about it. Please tell me everything what I've done bad
(especially what do you think about my enhancing images in Photoshop - color
correction, scaning etc.).
All pictures were enhanced only in
Photoshop 5.5. The film was Kodak Supra 400ASA, mount: EQ5, manually guided.
All pictures I have done in Poland,
Czestochowa 51N, 19E.
Comments welcome...
Clear skies, Chris
|
