[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] E200 vs. E200D

To: astro-photo@seds.org
Subject: Re: [APML] E200 vs. E200D
From: Mike Schexnaydre <mschex@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:04:09 -0400
Cc: astro-photo@seds.org
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010928164640.026ae660@pop3.norton.antivirus>
References: <3BB34722.BD1F36B@starmatt.com> <NFBBLDFPOLFDKKFCCLIGKELDCDAA.jeffball@netacs.net>
Reply-To: astro-photo@seds.org
Sender: owner-astro-photo@seds.org

I think the E200D is just designating that it is a daylight balanced color 
film.  Kodak also makes versions balanced for Tungsten lighting as well as 
several others.

Mike


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>

References:
- [APML] E200 vs. E200D
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>
- RE: [APML] Out-gassing(sp?)
  - From: "Jeff Ball" <jeffball@netacs.net>
- Re: [APML] E200 vs. E200D
  - From: Matt BenDaniel <matt@starmatt.com>

Prev by Author: Re: [APML] Any Pocono Update????
Next by Author: Re: [APML] Fish on the Platter
Prev by thread: Re: [APML] E200 vs. E200D
Next by thread: Re: [APML] E200 vs. E200D
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread