Re: [APML] 7331 be careful

["Robert Gendler" <robgendler@worldnet.att.net>]

Stosh,
My apologies. It was the initial post that made reference to comparison
with CCD. As a CCD imager I couldn't resist responding but I agree its
way off topic. I will respectfully stop at this point.
Rob Gendler
Email: robgendler@att.net
Web site: http://robgendler.astrodigitals.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stosh" <stosh@ptd.net>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [APML] 7331 be careful


> Rob,
> Although interesting, I don't see how any of your recent emails are
helping anyone
> on the list with their film astrophotography techniques.
>
> later,
> Stosh
>
> Robert Gendler wrote:
> >
> > Tony,
> > I agree with the below statement. IMO CCD can't compete (yet)
> > with film when it comes to widefield imaging and film can't compete
> > with CCD when it comes to dim fuzzies less than mag 9 or 10. Why
> > not get a CCD and have the best of both worlds. Put a CCD into
> > the hands of some of the fine astrophotographers on this list, with your
> > expert image processing skills and your dark skies and I'm afraid of
> > the possibilities. Why not have best of both worlds. I would shoot film
> > if I wasn't imaging under mag 4.5 skies here 20 miles from Hartford.
> > Rob Gendler
> > Email: robgendler@att.net
> > Web site: http://robgendler.astrodigitals.com
> >
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>