Re: [APML] Antares this year

["tan@home.com" <tan@home.com>]

Jim,

    Not a big deal, these things happen <g>.  Your 4x5 image is exquisite.
Looks like you've captured a lot of nebulosity here. Which film back are you
using? I really like this region of the sky. It has a whole lot of color in one
space. Thanks.

Loke


Jim Janusz wrote:

> Loke,
>
> You would ask that question.  AP quotes the 180 at 2.7 by 3.2 degrees, for
> 6x7 cm photography, plotting that on The Sky says it should not fit my
> image. Now here comes the bad part.  When I last moved 20 years of notes
> went missing so the details of the where and when of most of the 11
> negatives is gone.  When I look at recent 105 EDF negs. the field seems
> wider than this image.  When I look at a 4x5 image from this year it easily
> covers the area.
>
> Bottom line is you may have caught me on this one, they may be 105 EDF
> images in which case I really screwed up on the data sheet.  I'll just have
> to do some checking this month when I'm out to verify the field.
>
> Here is an idea of the full field width of the 180 on 4x5 film.
> http://home.ix.netcom.com/~jjanusz/Rho-bw-4x5-1-2-Blnd.JPG
>
> The large dark area is a shadow from my OAG but this gives you an idea of
> the coverage.
>
> Hmmmm
>
> BTW Here is a 300mm shot of the same area.
>
> http://www.geocities.com/palmdesertratx/Page-New-11.html
>
> Jim


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>