[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [APML] Lunar Photography



Hi Scott:
I think what you're running into is the "high magnification leads to mush" phenomenon. Even with unattainably perfect optics, the atmospheric turbulence ("seeing") results in a gradual loss of definition as you increase magnification. Since you're starting with a 2000 mm focal length at prime focus, when you start doing eyepiece projection, you're going up to gigantic amounts of magnification. You'd best get above the atmosphere for that! My best film shots of the moon have been made at prime focus or 2x Barlow. My 2 cents....
Bert
 
Bert Katzung
katzung1@home.com
www.astronomy-images.com
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, 03 September, 2001 9:24 AM
Subject: [APML] Lunar Photography

I have just experienced one of the more frustrating lunar photography sessions of my short life and have a couple of questions about the whole experience.
 
I have been  using an 8" Meade LX-200 and a Canon ELAN II (35mm SLR) doing prime focus (camera mounted directly to the telescope with out an eye peice) and am finaly starting to get some good results (for your viewing pleasure some of the more recent shots can be found at http://www.manetheren.net/night).  Focusing was a little off at first, and then I had some issues with camera shake (the mirror wasn't tripping up prior to shooting) but finaly worked those out.
 
So I figure I'm ready to try some eyepeice projection.  I throw in a 26mm super plossl (f/28.4), and right off the bat I notice I can't find that "sweet spot" in the focus where everything is crystal clear.  As my camera's meter is fairly sensitive, I bracket some of these shots on focus instead of shutter speed.
 
Then I decide to go for the gusto and throw in a teleview 4.8mm Nagler (f/198.5).  I couldn't even come close to getting things in focus.  Same results with my 9.7mm Super Plossl (f/94.3).  Everything is just a fuzzy gray and brown blur.  I tried extending my tele-extender all the way out and all the way back in.  Didn't make a diffrence.
 
I guess what I'm realy wondering is if those focal ratios (and attendant maginifcations) are simply beyond the ability of my scope and camera to handle. 
 
Thanks,
Scott
"God does not play dice with the universe; He plays an ineffible game of his own devising, which might be compared, from the perspective of any of the other players, to being involved in an obscure and complex version of poker in a pitch dark room, with blank cards, for infinite stakes, with a dealer who will not tell you the rules, and smiles all the time." -- Gaiman and Pratchett