Re: [APML] Unhypered film.

["bert katzung" <katzung1@home.com>]

Hi Mark:
I've used a lot of E200 (equivalent of EliteChrome 200) as well as the
negative films you mention. At this point, I think I like E200 and a
negative film, Agfa Optima-II 400, best. Konica Centuria 800 also looks
promising. Some tests of the Agfa and the Konica are at
http://www.astronomy-images.com/sources_sensors.htm
You can check out images with these, as well as LE400 and Supra 400 on my
web site at
http://www.astronomy-images.com/images.htm
Hope this helps....
Bert

Bert Katzung
katzung1@home.com
www.astronomy-images.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Park" <mark_park@hotmail.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Monday, 03 September, 2001 9:21 AM
Subject: [APML] Unhypered film.


> Since I can not afford to hyper film right now, how about some comparisons
> of unhypered film.
>
> I currently use mostly LE400, Supra 400, and Fugi Superia 800.  They seem
to
> work ok. I've not noticed any big differences between the LE and Supra.
The
> Fugi seems to lack on the red sensitivity.  I have also used Ektachrome
> Elite II 200 once, but did not do any kind of comparisons with other
films.
>
> Any comments?
>
> Mark Park
> Mark_park@hotmail.com
> AstroPhoto Page:http://www.wilkes.net/~tspark/astrphts.htm
> Home Page: http://www.wilkes.net/~tspark/
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>