Re: [APML]: Aerial lenses

[joneil@obs.empath.on.ca (Joseph O'Neil)]

Peter Ceravolo <ceravolo@fox.nstn.ca> writes:
> 
> But clearly the Schmidt would kill the average lens. However the lenses I am
> refering to can usually be had for less than $200 or so on the surplus
> market, far cheaper than a Schmidt.

Hi Peter;
    Were have you seen these lenses (surplus) for sale?

        As for your comments about un/de/non-hypered film, perhaps you 
just aren't 'pollitically correct' enough.  Perhaps we should call it  
film that has not been hypered "sensitivily challenged polymer based 
recording media", hypered film "photonically enhanced imaging mdeia" and 
film that is over hypered or gone past hypered and is now fogged out, 
"sensitivty harmed image transference" - or, SH*T for short.
(running and ducking)
joe