[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[APML]: Color film/urban site
I have been an astro photography fool this week with
our ver clear skies-- My photos are all well focused and
guided well (thanks for everyones help in figuring out
my ST4 problems)-- My problem now seems to be my suburban
setting and I'm wondering how to proceed from here. I know
that Steve Bell has achieved some good photos from a light
polluted location using hypered TP-- my question is can good
photos of dim objects using color film be achieved from a
moderatly light polluted site ? These are my results so far,
if someone could please advise me , I would greatly appreciate it.
I used four different films so far 1) Unhypered PPF 400 (UPP),
2) Hypered PPF 400 (HPP), 3) Unhypered Fuji 800 (UF8) and
4) Hypered Fuji 400 (HF4)-- I used my C11 at either f/10 or
at f/5.6 with a reducer. I am only judging the result as
good,fair,poor,etc--I realize that this is a crude way to
describe a photo. Poor refers to lack of faint structure
ie spiral arms of M51 due either to under exposure or lack
of contrast between object and light polluted background.
Object Film f/ratio exposure result
M51 HF4 f/10 60min fair (can see spiral arms)
M82 HF4 f/10 60min good
M27 UF8 f/10 60min fair-good
M17 UF8 f/10 60min fair-good
M31 UF8 f/10 60min fair-poor (some dark
lanes)
M31 HPP f/5.6 25min worse than above
(lots of "fog",no structure)
M31 HPP f/5.6 45min same as above
M42 UF8 f/10 45min good-excellent
(thankfully !)
NGC 7531 (?) UF8 f/10 90min fair-poor (no spiral structure)
M33 UPP f/10 90min poor (faint spiral
structure)
M33 HPP f/5.6 40min same as above
M1 UPP f/10 90min fair-good (can see red
filaments)
M1 HPP f/5.6 25min poor (no filaments, lot
of fog)
As I'm compiling this, I can see that I still need to make some comparisons,
like UPP and HPP for M42 and M51 and also HF4 and UF8 for M33.
Should I give up on getting a good color photo of M33 from my suburban site ???
Do these results seem typical ? Any advice (please !) ?
Thanks,
Dan Baldwin