RE: [APML] A small print film test...

["Chris Schur" <cschur@therim.com>]

Pat, interesting to see someone spend some quality time comparing films.  Im
not sure if the HQ series is commomnly availale as a "new" film, but I think
waly mart still carries the old stuff.


Clear Skies,

Chris Schur
Astro: http://www.PSIAZ.com/Schur/astro
Robotics: http://www.psiaz.com/schur/astro/roboticsmain.html

-----Original Message-----
From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org
[mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org]On Behalf Of Patrick Freeman
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 7:48 PM
To: 'Discussion of Film Astrophotography'
Subject: [APML] A small print film test...


Hi folks,

I recently had a chance to do a little more film testing, and just published
the test shots (M20) to my website for reference.  Here's the link:
http://home.woh.rr.com/pfcf/latest_film.htm

I tested Fuji Super HQ200 and Kodak Ultra Color 400.  The short version:
UC400 is awful and HQ200 looks really promising.

As some of you may remember, I've tested many films off and on over the last
3 years.  Mostly, I've shot M31, M45, M42, and M20 as test objects,
depending on my location, date, and time when the film was used.  The page
above shows the most recent films, although prior to the above two films it
has been quite some time since I've published any test results.  Anyway,
hopefully these results will be of benefit to you all.

Keep looking up,

Pat Freeman
pfreeman@woh.rr.com


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
---



---

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo