Re: [APML] A small print film test...

[Ray Butler <ray.butler@nuigalway.ie>]

Patrick,

Thanks for letting us know your latest testing results. That Fuji Super 
HQ200 looks really exciting. This must be the first bit of good news 
we've had in film choices for a long time. Now if only they'd make it in 
medium-format as well...

Ray

Patrick Freeman wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 
> I recently had a chance to do a little more film testing, and just published
> the test shots (M20) to my website for reference.  Here's the link:
> http://home.woh.rr.com/pfcf/latest_film.htm
> 
> I tested Fuji Super HQ200 and Kodak Ultra Color 400.  The short version:
> UC400 is awful and HQ200 looks really promising.  
> 
> As some of you may remember, I've tested many films off and on over the last
> 3 years.  Mostly, I've shot M31, M45, M42, and M20 as test objects,
> depending on my location, date, and time when the film was used.  The page
> above shows the most recent films, although prior to the above two films it
> has been quite some time since I've published any test results.  Anyway,
> hopefully these results will be of benefit to you all.
> 
> Keep looking up,
> 
> Pat Freeman
> pfreeman@woh.rr.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

-- 
Dr. Ray Butler (ray.butler@nuigalway.ie || ray@physics.nuigalway.ie)
Lecturer, Dept. of Physics || Computational Astrophysics Laboratory
National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
Tel: +353-91-524411 ext. 3788   FAX: +353-91-525700

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo