RE: [APML] A small print film test...

["Patrick Freeman" <pfreeman@woh.rr.com>]

Hi Wade,

You might try what I plan to do with my own remaining 3 rolls of UC400:  use
'em on the eclipse next week!  (Failing that, I think I just might pitch
'em, since I don't shoot hardly any "normal" stuff.  In fact, the manager of
the lab I take my film to about had a heart attack recently when I took a
roll of grandbaby pictures in!)

-- Pat


-----Original Message-----
From: astro-photo-bounces@seds.org [mailto:astro-photo-bounces@seds.org] On
Behalf Of Thomas W. Earle
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 01:16
To: 'Discussion of Film Astrophotography'
Subject: RE: [APML] A small print film test...

Pat,

You just saved me lots of time.  I was going to test some medium
format UC400, but after seeing your results, I want waste my time.
As an aside, I read somewhere that the UC400 is the old Portra 400
(i.e. new name same emulsion).  Given the poor results, it wouldn't
surprise me.  UC100 is supposedly a new emulsion.  

Again, I really appreciate you saving me time.  Now, what do I do
with the 5 rolls of 120 UC400?

Wade 


_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo

_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo