[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] Films responding to Ha, Hb, OIII
Stuart Heggie wrote:
> Ray, Canadian slang is consistent with American slang: bust is bad.
Thanks for the explanation! And apologies for committing the ultimate
faux-pas of mistaking a Canadian for an American. Happens to me too:
"Hey, you're Irish? Isn't that part of Great Britain?..." To which
ignorance, I reply: "Yeah, just like Texas is part of Mexico" (;-))
> So, for star trails it was a very poor performer.
When I think about it, that is not necessarily a bad sign. In a star
trail, each star spends only a short while on a given part of the film
emulsion, so it is like a stream of short exposures really. You would
not necessarily expect a film, whose strength is low reciprocity failure
over many minutes of sustained exposure on the same point of light, to
stand out in a star trail. A film with high raw speed but poor
reciprocity would appear to be more sensitive for that application...I
think!
Ray "who'd be proud to be a Canadian, too" Butler
> Stuart
--
Dr. Ray Butler (ray.butler@nuigalway.ie || ray@physics.nuigalway.ie)
Lecturer, Dept. of Physics || Computational Astrophysics Laboratory
National University of Ireland, Galway, University Road, Galway, Ireland.
Tel: +353-91-524411 ext. 3788 FAX: +353-91-525700
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
- References:
- [APML] Films responding to Ha, Hb, OIII
- From: "Michael Barlow" <mikeba@rochester.rr.com>
- Re: [APML] Films responding to Ha, Hb, OIII
- From: Ray Butler <ray.butler@nuigalway.ie>
- Re: [APML] Films responding to Ha, Hb, OIII
- From: "Stuart Heggie" <stuart.j.heggie@sympatico.ca>
- Re: [APML] Films responding to Ha, Hb, OIII
- From: Ray Butler <ray.butler@nuigalway.ie>
- Re: [APML] Films responding to Ha, Hb, OIII
- From: "Stuart Heggie" <stuart.j.heggie@sympatico.ca>