[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [APML] PPF 400 pushed...how's it do?
Wade;
Have you compared PPF400 to LE400? Wasn't LE400 supposed to be
rebadged PPF400? I found 20-30 rolls in the freezer. Thkx for your
input...joe :)
"May You Go Among The Imperishable Stars"
Joe Mize: jmize@svic.net
StarFields Observatory http://www.cav-sfo.com
Chiefland, FL 29:24'33.4"N 82:51'37.7"W
Moon Phase: http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/cgi-bin/phase.gif
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phillip Jones" <starfest@comcast.net>
To: "Discussion of Film Astrophotography" <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 1:00 AM
Subject: Re: [APML] PPF 400 pushed...how's it do?
> Thanks Wade!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas W. Earle" <twade@bmi.net>
> To: "'Discussion of Film Astrophotography'" <astro-photo@seds.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 6:08 PM
> Subject: RE: [APML] PPF 400 pushed...how's it do?
>
>
> > Phil,
> >
> > There is no need to hyper Kodak PPF 400. It is a fantastic film for
> > astrophotography; however, it is an older emulsion so it's very
> > grainy. I would refrain from pushing it since that would add to its
> > already basketball-sized grain.
> >
> > Wade
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Astro-Photo mailing list
> Astro-Photo@seds.org
> http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo
>
_______________________________________________
Astro-Photo mailing list
Astro-Photo@seds.org
http://seds.org/mailman/listinfo/astro-photo