Re: [APML] Flextight. Was: Best recent model 120 format scanner?

["Bert Katzung" <katzung1@attbi.com>]

Tony Hallas worked intensively with a Flextight (not sure which model) a
year or two ago and found it very unsuitable for astro images. IIRC he could
not get repeated scans to superimpose as expected and turned it in for a
different brand entirely.
Bert

Bert Katzung
katzung1@attbi.com
www.astronomy-images.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Koebel, Alen" <Alen.Koebel@christiedigital.com>
To: <astro-photo@seds.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:51 AM
Subject: RE: [APML] Best recent model 120 format scanner?


> Andy Forsberg wrote:
>
> > Has anyone considered the Flextight Photo by Imacon. It is
> > a 3200 dpi drum scanner that comes close to the $32,000
> > guys in resolution.  Just a thought.
>
> This might be in the category of "if you have to ask, you
> can't afford it" but what does this Flextight Photo cost?
>
> --  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>



--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>