Re: [APML] Bad E6 processing

["Chris & Jennifer Cook" <ccjd@ix.netcom.com>]

With what?
Another thing I noticed is that frames 1 and 2 are clear with some
yellowish/orange color covering half the frames

Chris


==================
Chris Cook
Astronomical Photography
www.abmedia.com/astro


-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Walker <swalker@SkyandTelescope.com>
To: astro-photo@seds.org <astro-photo@seds.org>
Date: Saturday, October 05, 2002 1:52 PM
Subject: RE: [APML] Bad E6 processing


>possibly the film was flashed during the process, Chris.
>
>Sean Walker
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-astro-photo@seds.org [mailto:owner-astro-photo@seds.org]On
>Behalf Of Chris & Jennifer Cook
>Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 1:39 PM
>To: astro-photo@seds.org
>Subject: [APML] Bad E6 processing
>
>
>Got a question for you guys who know a lot about the actual E6 process.  I
>sent in a roll of Provia 400F into Kodak for developing with a +1 push.
>I've not had a problem with them so far until now.  The problem is that
>parts of the roll are a emerald green, exposed frames and unexposed
>parts(sprocket holes etc...).  Obviously this is poor developing but what
>caused it go bright green?  Cross contaminated chemicals?
>Luckily, I only lost one set of shots of Gamma Cygni, NGC 281 looks ok and
>so do the aurora and some star trail images.
>
>Living out here in the sticks, Kodak is really the only alternative for E6.
>However, there is a pro lab in Boston that I might try next time.
>
>Chris
>
>
>==================
>Chris Cook
>Astronomical Photography
>www.abmedia.com/astro
>
>
>
>--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>
>
>--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>
>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>