RE: [APML] Picture Window Pro vs. PhotoShop

[Brian Sledz <brianhome@linkus.net>]

Hi Alan,
No I am not guidestar, but glad your rings are working well. ;-]
Brian

At 08:10 PM 10/3/2002, you wrote:
>Hey Brian,
>
>Thanks for the information packed reply. Sounds like
>something to look into.
>
>Your name sounds familiar. Are you linked to
>'Guidestar'? If so, the rings you made for the TV-85
>in May are working great and have helped me a lot. If
>not, sorry for the bad memory. :-)
>
>Thanks,
>Alan
>
>--- Brian Sledz <brianhome@linkus.net> wrote:
> > It seems like PWP takes less resources but I am not
> > sure.   I have both PWP
> > and PS.  If you want to get fast decent results PWP
> > is hard to beat.  It
> > took a few months before I got used to PS.  But PWP
> > seemed real easy to get
> > to use.  The gradient removal stuff was much easier
> > for me on PWP.  One
> > operational thing I like about PWP, when
> > manipulating images say a
> > brightness adjustment, you get another window to see
> > the changes and then
> > can hit apply.  But when you hit apply, a new image
> > is created while the
> > old one is untouched.  So you can have both side by
> > side without doing a
> > revert or closing and reopening.  It does however
> > leave you with many
> > windows, so just close down the ones you don't want.
> > Also I think PWP is much cheaper! ;-]
>
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
>http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
>--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
>              Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>


--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>