RE: [APML] Picture Window Pro vs. PhotoShop

[Alan Voetsch <critter12952@yahoo.com>]

Hey Brian,

Thanks for the information packed reply. Sounds like
something to look into.

Your name sounds familiar. Are you linked to
'Guidestar'? If so, the rings you made for the TV-85
in May are working great and have helped me a lot. If
not, sorry for the bad memory. :-)

Thanks,
Alan 

--- Brian Sledz <brianhome@linkus.net> wrote:
> It seems like PWP takes less resources but I am not
> sure.   I have both PWP 
> and PS.  If you want to get fast decent results PWP
> is hard to beat.  It 
> took a few months before I got used to PS.  But PWP
> seemed real easy to get 
> to use.  The gradient removal stuff was much easier
> for me on PWP.  One 
> operational thing I like about PWP, when
> manipulating images say a 
> brightness adjustment, you get another window to see
> the changes and then 
> can hit apply.  But when you hit apply, a new image
> is created while the 
> old one is untouched.  So you can have both side by
> side without doing a 
> revert or closing and reopening.  It does however
> leave you with many 
> windows, so just close down the ones you don't want.
> Also I think PWP is much cheaper! ;-]



__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

--  APML Archives at <http://astro.umsystem.edu/apml/>  ---
             Unsubscribe at <majordomo@seds.org>